- The Product Prism
- Posts
- π Riding the Growth Wave.
π Riding the Growth Wave.
Leveraging Research and Feedback in the 1 to N Phase

Insights
As your product transitions from the 0 to 1 phase to the 1 to N stage, the focus shifts from building and validating the product to scaling, optimizing, and continuously improving based on real-world feedback.
In this issue, weβll explore
Key differences between both phases.
Research and Feedback mechanisms.
Creating & Closing Feedback Loops: Tools & Tips
Problem Statement Evolution.
Feature prioritization: Eisenhower Matrix
Letβs dive in π
The Shift from Discovery to Optimization π‘
You've ignited the spark. Once a mere flicker, your product idea now shines bright, with real users fueling its growth. The 0 to 1 stage was all about validation β ensuring your solution met the problem head-on. As you transition from 0 β 1 to 1 β N, the landscape shifts. Optimization, scalability, and continuous improvement take centre stage βοΈ. Your focus sharpens.
The question shifts from "What should we build?" to:
"How can we improve what we've built?"
"How can we scale to meet the growing base?"
The User base expands in this 1 to N phase, and expectations rise. You must be nimble, responsive, and equipped with sophisticated tools to gather insights. The stakes are higher, but so are the rewards. Embracing this shift will propel your product to scale. π
Key differences between 0 to 1 and 1 to N:
0 to 1: Validate assumptions, build MVP, and acquire early adopters.
1 to N: Optimization, scalability, and continuous improvement
Continuous Feedback Loop π
As your product grows, so does the chorus of user voices. To harmonize, establish continuous feedback loops with five vital connections:
In-App Surveys: The Moment of Truth π¬
Imagine capturing user feedback at the precise moment of delight or frustration. Trigger surveys after significant actions:
"How easy was it to complete [action]?" (Scale of 1-10)
"What's the one thing we could improve?"
In-App Feedback: Instant Insights π‘
Unobtrusive, contextual feedback empowers users to share thoughts without leaving the app.
Inline suggestions
Toast notifications
Feedback buttons
Tool suggestions: Pendo, Hot Jar, Aha.
User Analytics: The Data-Driven Story π
User analytics provide a deep look into how customers interact with your product. This is data-driven feedback that helps you identify bottlenecks or opportunities for improvement and uncover hidden patterns in user behaviour.
Feature usage: Which features shine or hide?
Drop-off points: Where do users get stuck?
Conversion rates: How many succeed?
Tool suggestions: Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Pendo, and Amplitude illuminate the path.
Community Engagement: The User Forum π
Cultivate a loyal community, and you'll create a passionate army of users who are invested in your product's success, eager to contribute, and committed to long-term growth. You can achieve this by:
Host forums, social media groups, or feedback sessions
Encourage user-generated content and ideas
Respond to feedback, show empathy, and build trust
Customer Support Data: The Pain Point Puzzle π§©
Support tickets hold secrets to improving user experience:
Analyze logs with Zendesk or Intercom
Categorize common issues (navigation, pricing, billing)
Turn feedback into actionable insights
Closing the Loop: Turning Feedback into Action
Collecting feedback is just the beginning. To truly unlock user value, it is important to close the feedback loop to:
Build trust and loyalty π
Demonstrate user-centricity
Fuel continuous improvement βοΈ
Steps to close the feedback loop:
Respond to feedback, demonstrating empathy and understanding. π¬
Prioritize changes based on user input and data. π
Implement updates, features, or fixes. π»
Communicate changes to users, showcasing their impact. π’
Tune in, adapt, and thrive.
Tipπ‘: In many organizations, feedback lives in many locations, such as Slack, Inboxes, Documents, JIRA, etc. It is crucial to centralise and consolidate all feedback sources into 1 location. Tools such as Pendo, JIRA Product Discovery, and Aha do a good job at this.
Advanced Research Methods for Optimization π
Your product is live, but the journey's just beginning. To optimize performance, you need advanced research techniques. Let's dive in:
A/B Testing: The Ultimate Showdown πͺ
Pit two versions against each other. A substantial user base is important to get relevant results and actionable outcomes from A/B Testing.
Compare features, pages, or elements
Tweak copy, colours, or layouts
Analyze results to crown the winner
Tools π οΈ : Optimizely or Google Optimize
Heatmaps: The User's Eye π
See where users click, scroll, and linger:
Visualize user behavior
Identify patterns: hotspots, ignored sections
Optimize layout, e.g. If users arenβt scrolling far enough to see your call-to-action, you might want to move it higher on the page.
Tools π οΈ : Hotjar or Crazy Egg
Cohort Analysis: The User Journey π
Track user groups over time. Cohort analysis helps you track and analyze groups of users who share common characteristics or joined during the same time period.
Segment by signup date, feature usage, or source
Compare retention rates, spot trends
Example: Did January's onboarding updates boost long-term engagement?
Tools π οΈ : Mixpanel, Pendo, Google Analytics.
Refine & Prioritize π©
In the 1 to N stage, the goal is to continually refine and improve your product based on user feedback. 2 key activities of this stage are problem-solving and feature prioritization at this stage:
Problem-Solving π‘
As your product evolves, the original problem statements may shift. Features you once thought were core might become less important as new pain points emerge.
Regularly revisit your original problem statements. Check whether they still align with the evolving needs of your users.
Feature Prioritization π
In the 1 to N stage, the temptation to build new features can be strong, but your resources should be allocated based on what delivers the most value to users.
Use a data-driven approach and prioritization frameworks to prioritize which features to build next. Examples of prioritization frameworks include the Eisenhower Matrix, RICE, Kano Model, etc.
I find Eisenhower most straightforward and useful in this phase, but other prioritization frameworks could be more suitable, depending on the product type and the team.
Cut through the noise. Focus on what matters, on High Impactπ₯.

Eisenhower Matrix
Quadrant | Feedback Type | Action |
|---|---|---|
Low Effort, High Impact | Quick Wins | Do these first. |
Low Effort, Low Impact | Fill - inβs [Nice to Have] | It could delight your customers but shouldnβt be a focus. |
High Effort and High Impact | Major Projects | Plan and Add to Roadmap |
High Effort, Low Impact | Thankless Tasks | Do these last, if at all? Evaluate critically |
Question & Answer πββοΈ
Q: βYou have suggested so many tools. I donβt have the budget for all. How do I choose?β
A: This issue contains many strategies for collecting feedback. Decide on what matters most for your product and choose a tool that offers the most of your product and team's needs. For example, A/B Testing is not most useful for a product with a small sample size.
Q: βHow do I balance new feature development with optimizing existing features?β
A: Focus on the data. Prioritize features that solve pressing user problems and optimize based on user feedback. Address pain points before adding new features to ensure your product runs smoothly. [This! Gold.]